Welcome...and initial guidelines...

This blog will be used in the spring of 2008 by 80+ students at Drexel University to investigate the effects of Iraq on culture and the reverse. Our goal will be to better understand why the US is in Iraq, and to question whether literature can help us on this journey.

Weekly plans and other materials will always be posted in Vista, not this blog. So go to Bb Vista to get the discussion prompts and other instructions.

I intend this blog to manage our discussions and track our collective investigation.

You should have received an email from me inviting you to become a contributor to this blog. The email was sent Monday afternoon to your official Drexel email address.

Thursday, April 3, 2008

This War is no longer a war.

Iraq, as the United States has deemed it, is the model that they want the Middle East to follow once the Iraqi government establishes itself as an autonomous entity. The war was waged with a basis that Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction. A basis that was backed up with intelligence gathered by the different agencies and departments. As president, George W. Bush took the intelligence, consulted, and acted as he saw fit. The war was waged and has been declared over. What is left is the occupation of a Middle Eastern country. The view of a democratic state within the confines of such a religious and cultural haven has in fact enraged and infuriated the neighboring states (Iranian produced weapons etc.). The dissent comes from those who believe that Saddam Hussein was wrongly removed from power and that The United States is destroying their country. With that said, with the events of September 11, 2001 and the threat of a radical dictator having control of weapons of mass destruction, the intentions of the war were to preserve and protect the United States. Now, while people go quick to point the finger at all the deaths endured on both sides of the conflict, many disregard the abundance of terrorist activity in other countries and only focus on the negative aspects of this conflict that is publicized. There are US military personnel installations around the world, the Iraqi conflict is just one part of the war on terror. Islamic extremist regimes, for example, in the Philippines have long been monitored due to the contact with Osama bin Laden and Al Qaeda. And people will say, "why haven't we captured Osama?" and the fact remains we will not capture Osama until the mentality of terrorism is eliminated from the world. The United States removed a leader who used biological weapons on his own people. "Iraqis don't want us there" many will also say, but my high school history teacher, a Lieutenant Colonel in the United States Marine Corps, who is a military historian that was deployed in Iraq brought in and showed us the Iraqi ballots for elections, elections with more than one person on it, not just the Saddam-led Baath party, but parties that represented all walks of life within the Iraqi cultural community. Terrorism sees Iraq as a valuable possession as the US troops are still there, so that they can inflict more attacks on the US-backed government. Terrorism isn't just Al Qaeda, it isn't one certain goup of people, it is an idea that by placing terror in the enemies mind they will inevitably lead the enemy to destroy itself. Iraq is no longer the site of a war, it is an occupation that only history will be able to examine as the right or wrong choice for America.

No comments: